California is a national leader in food production, but there is mounting concern about the costs, land conversion, and water shortages.  At the same time, significant questions have come up about the role of water in the more developed regions of the state. Two panels at PCL’s annual Environmental Symposium (link) – one focused on our food, the other on water plans – will bring to light some of the concerns we are facing.

The Role of Food in California’s Environmental Future

Our food future may be at risk based on water availability, rising energy costs, loss of critical lands due to sprawl and poor planning, and other critical environmental factors.  This panel will focus on the role of food in California’s environmental future and what changes we may be headed toward, including a greater emphasis on local food production.  Participants will have a better awareness of the connection between food production, energy and water consumption, and environmental protection, and will hear about regulatory trends on food production.

  • Kari Hamerschlag, Environmental Working Group
  • Claudia Reid, Fresh Producers
  • David Runsten, Community Alliance with Family Farmers

Show Me the Water (Plan)

With water and the future of water at the state and local level being of extreme importance in planning for our future communities, the link between water usage and land use planning must be addressed.  This panel will focus on water in the planning process, including General Plan updates, Water Supply Assessments, and environmental review.  Participants will gain tools to engage in the land use process to promote better water use and tools for better connections between land and water will be considered, such as developing Title 24-like standards for water.

  • Curt Johansen, Sustainable Community Partners, LLC
  • Susan Lien Longville, Water Resources Institute
  • Dennis O’Connor, Principal Consultant, CA Senate Committee on Natural Resources & Water

The Annual Environmental Legislative Symposium and Awards Ceremony is Saturday, January 28, 2012 at the Sacramento Convention Center.  Register now to reserve your spot!  If space is still available, you may be able to book room at the Citizen Hotel.

With the beginning of the New Year, the Legislature reconvenes today to tackle California’s projected budget deficit of nearly $13 billion (through June 2013), 2011 legislation that was rolled over to the second year of this two-year legislative session, as well as new bills that will be introduced this session.

For environment protection, this means important 2011 bills like the banning of plastic grocery bags and polystyrene take-out containers, as well as requirements to force oil and gas firms to publicly list chemicals pumped into the ground during a drilling process known as hydraulic fracturing or “fracking”, will get a second chance in 2012.

While balancing the state budget and the potential fiscal impact of new legislation, the Legislature will also face critical decisions whether to repeal, delay or reduce the $11.14 billion water bond currently slated for the November ballot; whether or not more state parks should close and if so, which ones; and whether or not to appropriate more funds for California’s proposed $100 billion high speed rail system.

Complicating matters further, 2012 will be the first election year with independently redrawn and highly competitive district lines, as well as a Top 2 Open Primary System that allows voters to vote for any candidate (regardless of party affiliation) in each race during the primary, with the top two vote-getters then qualifying for the General Election. With so much uncertainty, some fear this may prevent the Legislature from passing meaningful legislation this session. Democratic leadership assures Californians that this is not true. Assembly Speaker John A. Pérez recently stated, “What you’ve seen over the last year is an ability for the Governor and the Legislature to come together and make very tough decisions – and I think you’re going to see more of the same.” With so many critical issues facing our state, it is PCL’s hope that the Speaker is correct in his assessment; and that when tackling these pressing matters, the Legislature acts deliberately, thoughtfully and transparently.

Recently, John Woodly, the former Assistant Secretary of the Army of Civil Works, wrote an article citing previous Administrations’ efforts to utilize unique government expertise in public and private sector projects. Specifically, he highlighted a dam removal project in North Carolina as an example of a collaborative effort that brought together civilian biologists and engineers to work with military demolition experts as means of “getting more from each appropriated dollar.” Fortunately, as Woodly noted in the recent article, California too has a dam removal project ripe for government funding.

The San Clemente Dam Removal Project provides an excellent opportunity to maximize the use of public dollars to achieve multiple objectives. The project will remove an unsafe dam, help to restore a vibrant ecosystem along the Carmel River, and in the process can provide prime training for military personnel.

The dam removal project is being carried out through a unique public-private partnership of California American Water (a private company), the State of California, and the National Marine Fisheries Service. It is widely supported by federal, state, and local agencies, as well as conservation and community groups. The Planning and Conservation League Foundation has played an important role in working jointly with the Carmel River Watershed Conservancy to complete a watershed study of the impacts of the dam structure, and we now are working on a public outreach and education campaign on the positive effects the dam removal will have in the watershed and public safety.

For three years, the California State Coastal Conservancy has been trying to secure the U.S. Department of Defense’s (DoD) assistance on the project through the Innovative Readiness Training Program (IRT). Despite the fact that the California National Guard has confirmed that the project would provide an excellent training opportunity due to the rugged terrain in the project area, the IRT program has rejected the project. Requests by Congressman Farr, Senators Boxer and Feinstein, and the CNG for DoD to overcome this obstacle have been unsuccessful.

So far, nearly $75 million of the estimated $83 million needed to complete the project has been secured by the project partners. Of that, less than $1.5 million comes from federal sources. The assistance of the IRT could provide valuable on-the-ground training for our forces while also helping to recover to listed species and a river system.  As Mr. Woodly stated, “We hear a lot about partnerships and collaboration in D.C., but I’m speaking of tangible projects, not just process alone, and that’s where we’ve really fallen short in the past few years.” If Secretary of Defense Panetta wants an easy success, the San Clemente Dam Removal project can provide it.

In recent years, legislation and voter-approved bonds have changed the way California addresses transportation and land-use planning.  In 2008, the Legislature passed SB 375, which focuses on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and vehicle miles travelled through the adoption of regional Sustainable Communities Strategies. That same year, voters approved nearly $10 billion in funding for High Speed Rail project, with billions more earmarked by the federal government. But how have these measures actually changed development practices in California to be more sustainable? Two panels at the PCL/PCLF Symposium will help answer this question, and focus on what we should do next:

SB 375: Where the Rubber Meets the Rail (CLE)

This panel includes information on the early adoption of the San Diego Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) and strategies for what must occur next to make the promise of integrated and sustainable planning a reality.  Participants will examine current SCS efforts as case studies, gain knowledge of the tools needed to engage in the SCS process, and learn about new legislative efforts to promote good growth and integrated/transit friendly development.

  • Mike McKeever, Sacramento Area Council      of Governments (moderator)
  • Laurel Impett, Shute, Mihaly and      Weinberger LLP
  • David Mogavero, Mogavero Notestine      Associates
  • Eliot Rose, UC Berkeley Center for      Resource Efficient Communities

Boondoggle or Beacon? The Future of High Speed Rail in California

California’s High Speed Rail (HSR) system has long been discussed, and remains one of the most expensive and controversial infrastructure projects in California’s history. HSR proponents see a vital project that will change California’s transportation landscape, reducing the need for new and expanded highways, and resulting in fewer greenhouse gas emissions…all while putting Californians back to work. Opponents of the current plan have been critical of its routing, financing plan, skyrocketing price-tag, and the ridership and business plan assumptions that have been made in developing the proposal.

  • Elizabeth Alexis, Californians      Advocating Responsible Rail Design
  • Denis Douté, SNCF America Inc.
  • Dan Richard, California High-Speed      Rail Authority Board Member

The Annual Environmental Legislative Symposium will take place on Saturday, January 28, 2012 at the Sacramento Convention Center.  Early bird (discounted) registration is available through December 31.  We’ve secured a room block at the Citizen Hotel; room reservations must be made by January 6, 2012 to receive the discounted rate.

Connect with PCL


PCL on Twitter

  • The Planning and Conservation League is being recognized by Friends of the River! PCL will receive an award for... fb.me/YJiXq8Sc 2 days ago
  • Prepping for our San Diego Fundraiser! You’re invited to join us June 14th in La Jolla! To purchase tickets visit pcl.org 2 days ago
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.