Last week, the California State Coastal Conservancy voted to authorize a grant award of up to $32 million of public funding to California American Water (CAW) for implementation of the San Clemente Dam Removal Project in Monterey County. This important vote brings the long-awaited plan for dam removal closer to fruition for the public/private partnership between the state and the water company.

 

With the funds approved, CAW plans to break ground by the end of September to remove the 106-foot-high concrete-arch San Clemente Dam. The $83 million project will help restore to health the Carmel River, which once supported a thriving steelhead run, and will help safeguard downstream communities along California’s central coast that are currently at risk if the dam fails.  As part of the partnership agreement, CAW will also donate over 900 acres of land adjacent to the Ventana Wilderness area in the Carmel Valley.

 

The project will provide tremendous environmental benefits, including removal of a significant barrier to the migration of steelhead trout to upstream spawning areas, as well as protection of critical wildlife habitat for species like the federally threatened California red-legged frog. The plan to demolish the aging dam also has support from the community as the best response to resolve earthquake safety issues determined by the state’s Division of Safety of Dams.

 

The largest ever dam removal project in California is moving forward because of an innovative public-private partnership between CAW and the State Coastal Conservancy, with the support of the National Marine Fisheries Service and more than two dozen regional, state and national conservation groups, elected officials and regulatory partners. The PCL Foundation has played a critical role in helping foster this partnership between local, state and federal agencies, environmental groups and businesses since the project’s inception.

 

“Hopefully, taking down the San Clemente Dam is just the first of many major removals throughout the state that will begin the process of restoring our rivers and streams back to health,” noted Bruce Reznik, Executive Director of the Planning and Conservation League Foundation.

Two weeks ago, Governor Brown evoked media uproar when he unveiled his plans to construct a pair of huge underground water tunnels to convey water from the Sacramento River to the Santa Clara Valley, Central Valley agribusiness and southern California. Since then, the overwhelming consensus has been unfavorable toward the budget busting project estimated to cost anywhere from $20-$50 billion. Throughout the state, opposition to the Governor’s water project is making headlines as Californians ask why their already-increasing water rates should skyrocket for this project that won’t provide regional water self-sufficiency.

Here’s what Californians leading media outlets have to say:

Statewide

Calif. unveils hot-button, $24B water tunnel plan (Associated Press)

California Water Wars: Will Thirsty Interests Divert More Water? (PBS)

Northern California

Twin-tunnel Delta plan concerns Placer water officials: Water rights questions in plan announced by Gov. Jerry Brown and top federal official (Auburn Journal)

PERIPHERAL TUNNEL: Governor announces twin tunnel plan; locals fear the worst for Trinity waters (The Trinity Journal)

Bay Area

Combatants in New CA Water War Dig In: Opponents call Governor’s Delta plan “plumbing before policy” and “a wink and a promise” (KQED News)

Delta tunnels would mean higher prices: State water plan Customers of 3 Bay Area agencies on the hook for construction costs (San Francisco Chronicle)

Delta tunnels would mean higher prices (San Francisco Chronicle)

Why is governor picking a water fight? (San Francisco Chronicle)

Gov. Jerry Brown fires first shot in new water war (San Jose, Mercury News)

Delta Region

Brown’s tunnel vision: It’s up to opponents to put a decisive end to governor’s blatant Delta water grab (Stockton, The Record)

Solano County leaders against Delta tunnel plan (The Reporter, Vacaville)

Peripheral Canal: A bad idea in the 1980s; a bad idea today (Woodland Daily Democrat)

Eclectic Delta coalition is set to fight proposal for ‘peripheral tunnels’ (Sacramento Bee)

Central Valley

Engineer: Fix Deltas levees, don’t build peripheral tunnels (Central Valley Business Times)

Central Coast

Governor’s State Water Proposal Draws Local Criticism: Average Water Bill for South Coast Water Consumers Could Increase (Santa Barbara Independent)

Southern California

Plumbing before policy in Delta decision (Santa Clarita Valley, The Signal)

Jerry Brown’s water plan is more than policy: In unveiling the latest version of the Peripheral Canal, the California governor is trying to finish what his father, Gov. Pat Brown, had started. (Los Angeles Times)

Tunnel vision may wreck Delta plan: State needs to be on same page on water use (Los Angeles Daily News)

$14B water project faces long haul: San Diego officials wary of cost for dual tunnels in Sacramento delta (San Diego Union-Tribune)

On Wednesday, Governor Jerry Brown is expected to announce the preferred project alternative for the Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP). Materials that were leaked last week show that the Governor plans to endorse a project that will put construction before science and politics before planning. Moreover, this project will put Californians on the tab for the largest water tunnel infrastructure project in history.

This proposal will allow the State to build a massive twin tunnel system to carry water from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta to Central Valley farmland and cities. Only after the infrastructure is built will we get around to governance and operations. Overwhelming scientific consensus shows that fish in the Delta Ecosystem need more fresh water; yet this proposal could divert more water from the already-failing ecosystem that supports critical habitat and a multi-million dollar fishing industry. The most egregious assertion in the proposal is that water exporters (the people that make money from selling this water) have key control over hiring, budget, science program, and even a veto power over improvements to biological goals and objectives. Furthermore, the State continues to refuse to do a cost benefit analysis for this project that, if it moves forward, will cost taxpayers and water customers in the tens of billions of dollars!

This announcement will resurrect a new version of the once-rejected Peripheral Canal proposal that will reignite water wars and the North-South divide of Brown’s previous of term as governor.  There are a number of serious concerns with this new proposal, most of all the blatant defiance of  the legal obligation to develop a plan for the Delta that balances the co-equal goals of “providing a more reliable water supply for California and protecting, restoring, and enhancing the Delta ecosystem (CA Water Code §85054).”

Rally Set for Wednesday at Noon to Protest Delta Plan

Tomorrow (Wednesday), July 25th, join farmers, fishermen, environmentalists and consumer advocates to protest the Governor’s environmentally destructive and exorbitantly expensive project. The rally will begin at Noon at the California State Capitol west steps. For more information contact Evon Willhoff, Water Program Manager.

Build it now, figure it out later is the approach the Brown and Obama Adminstrations are endorsing. But after they spend billions building new tunnels, the pressure would be overwhelming to maximize water exports no matter the consequences on the fish.

Link to KCRA Channel 3 News’ interview with PCL’s Jonas Minton: http://www.kcra.com/news/California-water-wars/-/11797728/15693418/-/oimvpmz/-/index.html

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.